Delhi HC Rejects Producer’s Plea to Dismiss FIR in Drishyam 2 Rights Fraud Case

Introduction

The Delhi High Court on August 8, 2025, refused to quash the FIR filed against Kumar Mangat Pathak, producer of Drishyam 2, amid an ongoing investigation into alleged fraud concerning the film’s overseas distribution rights. Justice Neena Krishna Bansal noted that as the probe is in its early stages and Pathak has cooperated with authorities, judicial interference is unnecessary at this point.

Allegations Surrounding Drishyam 2 Distribution Rights

The FIR, lodged in June 2025 by the Economic Offences Wing (EOW) of Delhi Police, accuses Pathak and others of conspiracy, forgery, and misrepresentation related to a ₹4.3 crore fraud. The complaint involves a businessman allegedly duped in a deal claiming exclusive Chinese-language distribution rights for Drishyam 2 covering China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan.

Disputed Deal and Middleman Involvement

According to the complaint, the businessman was contacted by Bharat Sevak, who falsely represented himself as Panorama Studios’ authorized agent. Sevak promised a lucrative deal and claimed to have transferred ₹15.75 crore out of an alleged ₹16.40 crore total. However, Panorama Studios denied receipt of these funds and stated any authorization granted to Sevak had expired before the deal.

Producer’s Defense and Court’s Decision

Kumar Mangat Pathak’s legal team argued the dispute was purely commercial and should not have escalated into a criminal case. They stressed Pathak’s ongoing cooperation with the investigation and pursuit of alternative legal remedies. Despite this, the Delhi High Court declined to stay the proceedings or dismiss the FIR.

Conclusion

The Delhi High Court’s refusal to quash the FIR in the Drishyam 2 rights fraud case underscores the judiciary’s cautious approach toward ongoing fraud investigations, prioritizing the investigative process while noting the producer’s cooperation.